The Shape of Water is now playing at the Minor Theatre. Photo by Patrick Maravelias.

‘The Shape of Water’ is charming

It's not that weird, trust me.
Translate

The Shape of Water is written and directed by Guillermo del Toro. There was a lot of hype leading to the film and it received glowing reviews. It was recently nominated for 13 Oscar awards, making it the most nominated film this year. The film arrived in local theaters a month after national release, and it was worth the wait.

The lead of the story is Elisa, played by Sally Hawkins, a mute woman who cleans during late hours at Occam Aerospace Research Center with her friend Zelda, played by Octavia Spencer. The center receives a top secret project the scientists must research, a near-human creature no one has ever seen before. By research, they mean torture to see what happens.

Elisa connects with this amphibian-like animal, and they intimately understand each other without verbal communication. Elisa attempts to rescue the creature with the help of Zelda and her neighbor Giles before the boss of the project catches up to kill the creature.

It was an exciting and charming story. There are fairy tale elements, like Elisa’s origins. In the beginning, Zelda explains to their superior that she was found by the river as a baby with gill-like scars on her neck and brought to an orphanage.

With her connection to water and the creature, it was obvious that they were meant to be. This shuts down any beastiality claim, because both of them weren’t humans to begin with. Without the ability to talk, Elisa is still expressive and has a great sexuality to her. She desires love and sex, but doesn’t display her sexuality to the world. If writers are to write a sexy character, it should be for the character and not for the audience, like Elisa.

Like all fairy tales, there should be a villain, and her boss, Colonel Richard Strickland, played by Michael Shannon, is a decent villain. Strickland is not necessarily maniacal, but he tortures the creature without regret and talks down to everyone around him.

Strickland goes home in his new car to adoring kids and a loving wife that asks for sex, but he acts like it’s a chore. He clearly has a good life, but has no appreciation for it, making his defeat all the more satisfying.

If you like fairy tales with more bite than the average Grimms tale, or nostalgia for black and white musicals, this is worth catching before it leaves theaters.

 

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on reddit

More Stories

Weathering situationships, the right way

by Valen Lambert Gen Z has been turning tradition on its head. Gender? That is so last season. Sexual preferences? All of it. Partners? Four and we’re all best friends. We’re holding the reins of a cultural revolution that’s redefining

Good vibes at Good Relations

by Alana Hackman Nestled away in Old Town Eureka on 2nd and D street is Good Relations, Humboldt County’s very own independent lingerie and sex store. Founder Linda Meyers began the company in 1983 while attending Humboldt State University for

2 Comments

  1. Mehmim Mehmim Friday, September 24, 2021

    “With her connection to water and the creature, it was obvious that they were meant to be. This shuts down any beastiality claim, because both of them weren’t humans to begin with. Without the ability to talk, Elisa is still expressive and has a great sexuality to her.”
    Yeaaaaah nope. Animal is a taxonomic rank. A person who cannot speak is still a human as they are part of the Homo genus. The Fish man is not. There are rumors that suggest that the lady was actually the same species as the fish man, so then it would not be beastiality. But if she is a human then it IS beastiality.
    And as for the “THEY WHERE MWEANT TO BE”, nope. There is no such thing as “THEY WHERE MWEANT TO BE”. People can meet many people who are compatible with them, meaning that even if in this universe you are already with someone, in an alternate reality you might of ended up with someone else. Also, fiction is fiction. The fact that you see something morally and biologically wrong and disgusting in a movie does not mean you have to support it in real life. After all its just a movie, and am sure Guillermo did not tried to promote zoophilia and only used the couple as a metaphor.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: