Bodhi Haugen
As California prepares to eliminate disposable nicotine vapes, the topic goes beyond just people’s health. The state’s new law surrounding vapes raises questions centering on addiction, sustainability and safety.
According to Assembly Bill No. 762 (AB 762) posted on California Legislative Information, “This bill would prohibit, beginning January 1, 2027, a person from importing or manufacturing for sale in this state a new or refurbished disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device, and, beginning January 1, 2028, prohibits a person from selling, distributing, or offering for sale a new or refurbished disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device in this state.”
The ban does not apply to marijuana vapes, while both devices use the same lithium-ion battery to function.
A California Assembly committee analysis of AB 762 states that lithium-ion batteries in vapes are “highly flammable, cannot be removed and post costly safety issues at every point of the waste stream. These devices are thrown in the trash, and sent to material recovery facilities where they can ignite, posing safety risks to workers.”
According to the Department of Cannabis Control’s Monthly Sales Report, vape sales in California have exceeded flower sales in 2025 and are projected to surpass them again in 2026. Although nicotine vape sales in California do not provide similar statistics, the California Tobacco Facts and Figures from the California Department of Public Health state that vaping has increased since 2020, with 1.5 million Californians reporting current vape use.
Cassidy Faye, a wildlife conservation and management senior, didn’t know about the ban but thinks it’s ethical for California to ban nicotine vapes without weed vapes for addictive reasons.
“I think that it’s fair if they only ban nicotine vapes because it’s more addictive chemically,” Faye said. “With weed you don’t really; like some people sit around and hit the dab pen all day but it’s not as common I feel like and that would get you high as f[uck].”
Faye also considers previous concerns with nicotine vapes, and recalls their original purpose when initially released to help smokers quit.
“I feel like the main issue with it was that they had these really, like what’s this, Juicy Peach Ice, like that’s a child. That’s like—that’s—it’s like a lollipop, it tastes like a lollipop. And so a big issue is that kids were getting into it because it tasted good and it was cool or whatever,” Faye said. “And I think that vapes do have a purpose, because some people who are super addicted to cigarettes, they switch to vapes and that actually does help them cut down. So, I feel like it should still be an option.”
As California moves toward phasing out disposable nicotine vapes, the challenge goes beyond passing a new law. The ban’s long-term impact remains uncertain, but the changes in safety risks of disposable vaping devices will become clear in the following years.
Bodhi is a reporter and news editor for the Lumberjack. You can reach him at bgh27@humboldt.edu





















